clear evidence of urgency. TRO decisions are swift (usually within hours or days). TROs are temporary, generally lasting up to 14 days (extendable by court order), with a subsequent preliminary injunction hearing for longer-term relief. Timing Considerations: Due to the emergency nature of TROs, they should be filed immediately upon recognizing an imminent threat or irreversible harm. Delays in filing significantly reduce the likelihood that the court will grant relief. Generally, courts expect TRO petitions within days or even hours after the petitioner learns of the impending immigration enforcement action. • Petitions under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA): Used when challenging agency actions that are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise contrary to law (5 U.S.C. § 706). APA claims typically address USCIS denials, improper SEVIS terminations, visa revocations, and other immigration-related harms involving alleged legal or procedural errors. Such claims require demonstrating that the agency violated its own regulations, policies, or applicable federal statutes, or failed to properly consider evidence. Procedural Steps: An APA lawsuit is initiated by filing a complaint in U.S. federal district court. It generally requires detailed documentation, including the complete administrative record (agency decisions, notices, correspondence, and related documents), a clear legal memorandum outlining the basis for challenging the agency’s decision, and supportive affidavits or declarations if necessary. Timing Considerations: APA challenges typically must be brought within the federal six-year statute of limitations (28 U.S.C. § 2401), although prompt filing is recommended to ensure evidence preservation and enhance the likelihood of obtaining relief. Shorter timeframes may apply in urgent immigration enforcement contexts. Potential Relief Sought: Remedies frequently pursued under APA litigation include declaratory judgments (confirming the agency’s actions were unlawful), injunctions to prevent future enforcement or implementation of unlawful actions, and orders vacating or reversing unlawful agency decisions. • Constitutional Claims for Due Process Violations: Applicable when a student is deprived of constitutionally protected rights, such as receiving proper notice, having a meaningful opportunity to present evidence, and obtaining a fair hearing or appeal process. These protections apply if a government action affects protected liberty or property interests — such as lawful immigration status, freedom from detention, or the ability to remain in or reenter the United States lawfully. Due process claims frequently emerge from expedited removal proceedings, unexplained visa revocations, SEVIS terminations without sufficient notice or hearing, and arbitrary denials of entry at ports of entry. Procedural Steps: Litigation typically involves filing a complaint in federal district court alleging violations under the Fifth Amendment (for noncitizens), supported by detailed evidence such as administrative notices, decisions, correspondence, sworn affidavits, and any records
16
LexElite Law
Powered by FlippingBook